Last Updated: 4th June 2023
GT Writing Task 2 / Essay Sample # 372
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe that they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Model Answer 1:
It is argued that skilled professionals, for instance, physicians, IT professionals and engineers, should serve the country from where they have received their training, while others feel that they should have complete freedom in working in the countries of their choice. I believe that yet it is their right, moral obligation is placed on them to deliver service in the nation’s interest.
Some argue that highly qualified personnel ought to have the right to work anywhere they wish. The cogent reason for the right is the turmoil within a country. Put simply, many nations suffer from spiralling inflation, which in turn drives millions into abject poverty, thereby triggering mass unrest and protest. Consequently, many leave their homeland, swapping financial chaos at home for a favourable opportunity to thrive. In recent years, for example, highly competent professionals, including doctors and engineers, have been leaving Sri Lanka in droves for career opportunities in Dubai. Despite this, I would argue that they are duly obliged to serve their nation.
If highly qualified personnel leave their country, the investment in their higher education is lost, which is something they are expected to cover. Since the country spends considerably on education for highly trained people, they should work in their country so as to return the favour. In addition, when most talented individuals do migrate, the possibility of stimulating development is reduced, sustainable development does not take place and this in turn translates into more migration which again brings about adverse effects on the ability to develop for a nation. A case in point is African countries. Several studies reveal that developments do not occur there due to brain drain. I, therefore, believe that it is their moral obligation to work in their country.
In conclusion, while one should enjoy the right to work anywhere, I think that highly qualified professionals should serve the nation which bears the costs for training them as it is an obligation they owe to the country.
Model Answer 2:
In contemporary discourse, there is a divergence of opinions regarding the employment rights of professionals, including doctors and engineers, in relation to the country where they received their training. While some contend that these professionals should be mandated to work in their country of training, others argue for the freedom to seek employment abroad. This essay will examine both perspectives. Personally, I think that it is better if such professionals are free to work where they prefer and can better utilise their skills.
On one hand, proponents of the first viewpoint assert that requiring professionals to work in their country of training is essential for the development and progress of the nation. They argue that by obligating these skilled individuals to remain in their home country, the local workforce will be strengthened, leading to improved infrastructure and services. For instance, in the field of medicine, if doctors are required to serve in their country of training, it can alleviate the shortage of medical professionals in rural areas and underserved communities. This approach ensures that the expertise gained through training is utilized to benefit the domestic population directly.
On the other hand, advocates of professional freedom argue that individuals should have the autonomy to choose where they work, irrespective of their country of training. They contend that such freedom enables professionals to explore global opportunities, learn from diverse experiences, and contribute their expertise to different contexts. For instance, engineers who gain knowledge and skills in one country may apply their expertise to tackle unique challenges in another country, fostering cross-cultural collaborations and innovation.
Personally, I support the stance that professionals should have the freedom to work in any country they desire. This approach encourages the exchange of knowledge and expertise, promotes cultural understanding, and enables professionals to make valuable contributions globally. Additionally, it incentivizes countries to invest in high-quality training programmes, knowing that their professionals will have the freedom to apply their skills and expertise both domestically and internationally.
In conclusion, the debate surrounding whether skilled professionals should be required to work in the country where they received their training is a complex one. While there are valid arguments for both viewpoints, I believe that granting professionals the freedom to work in other countries enhances their professional growth and facilitates the exchange of knowledge, ultimately benefiting both individuals and societies worldwide.